Since the establishment of the National Healthcare Security Administration (NHSA) in 2018, the National Reimbursement Drug List (NRDL) has added over 700 emergency, life-saving, and innovative drugs. This blog provides an overview of the NRDL’s history, highlights the key changes for 2024, and discusses the potential impact on both local and international pharmaceutical industries.
History of the NRDL
Out of 700 drugs added in to the NRDL since its inception, 446 new drugs were added through negotiations, focusing on newly launched drugs with high clinical value across 31 therapeutic areas. The inclusion and exclusion criteria of these innovative drugs reflect the key unmet needs identified by the NHC (National Health Commission) and clinical value of selected drugs each year. As a result, each year can be characterised by the way in which the NRDL was implemented:
2020: The year of ‘urgent’
The 2020 NRDL emphasised the urgent clinical need for COVID-19 prevention and control. The process enabled COVID-19 vaccines to be available to the general public as soon as possible. This approach was essential to address the immediate health crisis posed by the pandemic.
2021: The year of ‘new’
The 2021 NRDL highlighted the inclusion of drugs with significant changes in indication or therapeutic areas, particularly for the treatment of respiratory diseases related to COVID-19. This change aimed to incorporate the latest advancements in medical treatments for pandemic-related health issues.
2022: The year of ‘focus’
The 2022 NRDL placed special emphasis on drugs in the “Encouraged generic drug list” and the “Encouraged paediatric drug R&D list.” Chronic disease treatments and rare disease treatments also received increased attention, reflecting a broader strategy to address long-term health challenges.
2023: The year of ‘improve’
The 2023 NRDL focus was on enhancing coverage for chronic diseases, rare diseases, and paediatric drugs. The NRDL saw the addition of 126 new drugs, including 15 orphan drugs covering 16 rare diseases. Notably, drugs for rare diseases with high unmet needs, such as Gaucher disease and myasthenia gravis, were included.
To maintain the affordability of healthcare funding, drugs with low clinical value have been systematically removed from the NRDL each year. From 2019 to 2023, a total of 273 drugs was excluded from the list, ensuring that the NRDL remains focused on high-value treatments.
2024 NRDL: Key changes and potential impact
NHSA published the 2024 NRDL Work Plan on 28th June 2024, which is the guideline for 2024 NRDL process. The keyword for the 2024 NRDL is "steady." The aim is to ensure the NRDL covers the basic medical needs, refine the drug catalogue structure, optimise fund management, standardise payment, improve coverage fairness, and maintain funding affordability. The 2024 adjustment procedure focuses on balancing medical needs and funding affordability.
A significant change in the 2024 NRDL Work Plan is linking the NRDL outcome to the manufacturer's credentials, and/or supply ability. Drugs included through negotiation but failing to supply as agreed will be closely monitored and may be removed based on their credentials and supply ability over the last three years. This approach ensures that drugs meet patient needs rather than merely occupying a spot in the NRDL. Drugs meeting the following criteria are likely to be removed from 2024 NRDL:
- Drugs in the ‘regular catalogue’ failed to supply the designated medical institutions in the past three years
- Negotiated drugs failed to supply as in the contract as of 30th June 2024
- Drugs that comply with Articles 9 and 10 of the Interim Measures for the Administration of Drugs for Basic Medical Insurance
Similar to previous NRDL process, the 2024 NRDL Work Plan outlines a five-stage process: preparation, application, expert review, negotiation, and announcement of results. The process began on 1 July, and the results will be announced in November 2024.
Pricing negotiation
Since implementing the NRDL, the NHSA has introduced price/volume-based negotiations to control drug acquisition costs and to maximise the funding utilisation. The average price cut ranges from 50.64% in 2020 to 61.7% in 2023 from the launch price. A notable example is the 2021 negotiation of Nusinersen (inj.), where the price dropped from RMB 697k/vial (~£70k/vial) to RMB 30k/vial (~£3k/vial), a 95.7% reduction.
In 2022 alone, 275 drugs included in the NRDL were prescribed/reimbursed 180 million times. This means the price reduction of these medicine saved 210 billion RMB of the insurance fund. The 2024 NRDL price negotiations are expected to continue this rigorous approach with the expected price reduction in 50-60% range.
The NHSA published the negotiation drug renewal rules and non-exclusive drug bidding rules in July 2023. No changes are made in these rules for publication and companies are expected to prepare for the same process according to these rules if drugs are already included in the 2023 NRDL.
Apart from the NRDL, the DRG/DIP (diagnosis-related groups/disease-specific payment) payment reform also has a significant impact on drug reimbursement and market penetration in China. ICON will monitor this policy in China and provide our insights on how DRG/DIP impact payment methods and market penetration of your assets in a future blog.
Key takeaway
The 2024 NRDL adjustments signify a significant step towards maintaining a balanced approach to healthcare funding and access to essential drugs in China. By focusing on refining the drug catalogue structure, standardising payment, and ensuring the reliability of drug supply, the NRDL aims to address both immediate and long-term healthcare needs effectively. The integration of manufacturer credentials, and supply ability into the NRDL decision-making process underscores a commitment to patient-centric care and sustainable healthcare management.
As the NRDL evolves, it is crucial for pharmaceutical companies to stay informed and agile in response to these changes. ICON’s expertise in tracking policy developments and analysing their impact can help companies navigate the complexities of the NRDL, ensuring they remain competitive and compliant in this dynamic landscape.
Understanding the intricacies of the NRDL and its annual adjustments is vital for aligning commercial strategies with regulatory expectations. By leveraging insights and expertise, pharmaceutical companies can better position themselves to meet the evolving healthcare needs of the Chinese population while contributing to the overall goal of sustainable and equitable healthcare access.
At ICON, we understand the challenges of tracking rapidly evolving market access policies and comprehending their impact on your commercial strategy. Our Insights, Evidence and Value team within Commercial Positioning provides updated policy changes, analysis and insights, and subject matter experts can help you understand the implications on pricing, evidence generation, value proposition, and commercialisation of your assets.
Contact us for more information.
References
- https://www.nhsa.gov.cn/art/2024/6/28/art_109_13084.html
- https://www.nhsa.gov.cn/art/2024/6/28/art_105_13085.html
- https://www.nhsa.gov.cn/art/2024/7/11/art_52_13185.html
- https://www.nhsa.gov.cn/art/2024/7/11/art_14_13186.html
- https://www.nhsa.gov.cn/art/2024/7/11/art_14_13188.html
- https://www.nhsa.gov.cn/module/download/downfile.jsp?classid=0&filename=d1339a95fd0a4ab28a367c65ddeafb8c.pdf
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- Remote Patient Monitoring
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Patient Centricity
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Diversity and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
- Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
-
Therapeutics insights
- Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
- Central Nervous System
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
- Blended solutions insights
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Global Outcomes Benchmarking
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel