The importance of an effective global labelling process can sometimes be overlooked in the wider industry. With the right process in place, sponsors can avoid regulatory delays and streamline complexity for robust labeling. Having an efficient global labelling process in place will help expedite time to market and commercialisation and improve access to patients in need.
Here, we outline essential components for an efficient process to support program success.
Start the labeling process early
Define the product label as early as possible in the drug development process to ensure that the development program generates the appropriate data needed to support the target label. This will also help define ambitious, desirable or undesirable scenarios for the proposed commercial label.
Creating a high-level overview of all applicable product requirements enables categorisation into common and diverging necessities for content and technical requirements. This is a comprehensive starting position to create the desired label.
It is also worth noting that the labelling process itself does not vary greatly between different types of product or regulatory procedures, or for advanced therapies, cell or gene therapies. Such products may have special requirements to label for autologous use or technical requirements to label and supply frozen product, but the labelling process itself is unaffected.
With this in mind, the labelling process needs to start during the drug development process.
Appoint decision makers and experts
Clear roles and responsibilities help to streamline operations and minimise the potential for delays at decision points. Identify and engage the decision makers early in the process. The decision maker’s role is to support the overall program strategy, specific requirements and direction. Make sure the role and area of responsibility are clear for each decision maker involved in the process to ensure endorsements and decisions are made in a timely manner.
Recruit the right subject matter experts (SMEs). The global labelling strategy should be approached holistically. Assemble a specialised regulatory team who will round out a comprehensive global approach, including:
- Local insights
- Knowledge on regional regulatory requirements
- Influential factors and drivers from specific functions, such as supply chain and commercial
Maintain a single source of truth
Within global labelling processes, it is especially important to define the approach to centralise key information that will guide company core, regional and domestic label content. Developing and managing label content in a single location, such as a document management system or regulatory information management tool, ensures harmonisation and ease of access for teams across geographies. This will improve collaboration and allow for centralised decision-making by keeping all relevant information in one place for the team to review and weigh options.
Embed data responsiveness and quality checks
Define steps and required SMEs to address new clinical data or label inputs. Such inputs can result in expedited timelines and potentially earlier approval. Defining these steps may also be critical if there is a need to re-evaluate the development program. Proactively implement this framework to ensure new information, i.e., data read-outs or health authority comments, are addressed quickly and the team maintain focus on the desired label.
Conduct quality control as a consistent step in the label development process. Checking accuracy of data between source and labelling, proofreading artwork against regulatory text, and ensuring the appropriate local templates and guidance is used will minimise delays in finalising the label without compromising the quality of the content. Failure to be proactive in quality control may result in labelling content errors, incorrect information for patients and healthcare professionals, or delays in the ability to supply the product.
Establish a documentation retention approach
Implement a framework to consistently manage agendas, minutes, and RAID logs (Risks, Actions, Issues and Decisions) to ensure transparency, alignment and retention of information for easy project team access and reference. Integrated systems will improve accessibility and support faster, more effective collaboration across the multidisciplinary teams that will input into the label process.
Companies of all sizes and of different specialities benefit from long-term retention of this information. This will ensure that data is always accessible, even if the original project team is no longer available or a product has been transferred to another business.
Conclusion
Operational excellence is the key to delivering an ambitious filing strategy and ultimately creating access to the product for patients.
The labeling process is universal for any research and development program to function well. No matter the regulatory procedure or type of product, including advanced therapies, cell or gene therapies, the labelling process enables companies to respond quickly to new information.
By following the approach outlined here, organisations can create a sustainable labelling framework that eliminates process delays, ensures decisions made during the development process are preserved for future reference, and contributes to enhanced business performance and long-term success.
Connect with us to learn how ICON's Regulatory Consulting Solutions team can assist you in developing an effective filing strategy to set your program up for success.
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- Remote Patient Monitoring
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Patient Centricity
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Diversity and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
- Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
-
Therapeutics insights
- Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
- Central Nervous System
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
- Blended solutions insights
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Global Outcomes Benchmarking
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel