Running clinical trials in retinal disorders can be challenging particularly in a crowded research landscape, due to the complexity of the diseases and the unique characteristics of the patient population. In this blog, we will explore the complexities of running clinical trials in retinal disorders and discuss ways to overcome these challenges based on our experiences from running multiple global retina studies in various indications.
Patient recruitment
To overcome this challenge, clinical trial sponsors can work with patient advocacy groups and retinal specialists to identify potential study participants. ICON is uniquely positioned to deliver innovative and fully integrated patient identification, recruitment, and retention solutions. Our Patient Recruitment and Retention experts leverage industry-leading expertise and our in-house digital capabilities to deliver customised, patient-centred outreach campaigns that address study participation barriers, drive patient enrolment, and foster strong relationships with patients to ensure retention and compliance. Our strategies and educational tools allow us to target our messaging for a variety of different audiences (such as physicians, referring physicians, patients, and/or caregivers) in an effort to create awareness of trial specifics in the community of interest.
Additionally, sponsors can consider expanding the geographic scope of the trial to increase the pool of eligible patients. With our ophthalmology trial experience, ICON has established relationships with high-performing retina sites globally that have the experienced staff, capabilities and equipment to conduct these trials. To support and engage site staff and to help drive site performance, training compliance, and inspection readiness we provide ICON’s award-winning site portal FIRECREST that helps site staff navigate complex protocols and minimise the site’s burden.
Disease progression
Retinal disorders are one of the most common causes of blindness. They can progress slowly, which means that clinical trials may need to be longer than trials in other diseases in order to see meaningful results. This can increase the cost and complexity of running the trial. Additionally, retinal disorders can present a wide range of symptoms and severity, even within the same disease subtype, which can make it difficult to design a trial that can detect meaningful changes in disease progression as well as to interpret the results of the trial and generalise them to the broader patient population.
To address the challenge of disease progression, we can support clinical trial sponsors in considering use of adaptive trial designs that allow for changes in the trial protocol based on interim data analysis. This can help to ensure that the trial is designed to detect meaningful changes in disease progression.
Endpoint selection and variability
Choosing appropriate endpoints for clinical trials in retinal disorders can be challenging. For example, visual acuity is often used as an endpoint, but it may not be sensitive enough to detect changes in some indications. Additionally, some retinal disorders may have multiple endpoints that need to be considered. Our therapeutic expertise and ophthalmology experience enable us to support clinical trials sponsors to identify appropriate endpoints and tailor strategies that meet your study’s unique needs. In addition, to minimise variability and ensure standardisation in ophthalmology clinical trials, appropriate selection of central reading centres (RC) is key to study success. ICON has built strong relationships with photography and visual acuity reading centres that have experience in multiple protocols spanning a wide variety of retinal diseases. Given the importance of RC data in supporting the study endpoints and the critical path these play in timelines for starting the trial due to site certifications, ICON collaborate with the sponsor and reading centres to develop standardised protocols that can be used across multiple sites.
Patient compliance
Many retinal disorders require frequent follow up at the clinic, which can be burdensome for patients. This can lead to poor compliance with the treatment regimen, which can affect the results of the clinical trial. To address the challenge of patient compliance, clinical trial sponsors can consider using patient-friendly treatment regimens, such as extended-release formulations or less frequent dosing schedules. In addition, when appropriate, ICON also recommends use of an e-diary solution to monitor dosing compliance and supporting study efficacy endpoints. We recommend using a bring-your-own device approach to help patients to easily report study drug dosing. To reduce the financial burden on patients and increase variability of participating in clinical trials, we suggest sponsors provide patients with travel assistance, patient stipend, and other supporting activities based on the targeted patient population.
Contact us
To learn more about ICON’s services and how can we can support you in running clinical trials in retinal disorders, please refer to your ICON contact or visit www.iconplc.com/contact.
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- Remote Patient Monitoring
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Patient Centricity
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Diversity and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
- Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
-
Therapeutics insights
- Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
- Central Nervous System
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
- Blended solutions insights
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Global Outcomes Benchmarking
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel