Typically, a biotech company’s primary goal is to complete the most expeditious drug development program possible to keep costs down while showing the potential utility of the asset they are developing. It is a tight line to walk. The focus is often on moving quickly through the next stage gate, releasing positive data and attracting new funding. While this may be a laudable approach, shifting focus from quicker and cheaper processes to a more value-oriented strategy will benefit the asset development process. Biotechs can build value into their asset by way of developing a reimbursable Target Product Profile (rTPP), no matter where they are in the process.
Where a conventional TPP serves as a roadmap to gain regulatory approval, a reimbursable TPP extends to valuation, market positioning, patient access and reimbursement strategies. An rTPP builds greater value into your long-term goals, which is key information for investors, buyers or payers. Whether looking for early or late-stage investment, M&A or taking a drug all the way through clinical development, biotechs should utilise an rTPP to determine the economic viability of the asset and make it more attractive.
Even so, many biotechs don’t.
Why don’t they? – Short-term cost focus.
Many emerging biotechs are keen on progressing high-end science into clinical studies and are acutely focused on achieving their next milestone. They are enthusiastic about the potential of their drug and pour their efforts into progressing through stage gates. They may have a generalised idea of where they may position their product, but when the focus is on the next step, things like the patient access and differentiation of their product can often seem too far away to merit access to their time and resources during the early stages. As the sky-high funding landscape of 2021 settles into a more controlled flow of funds, biotech companies are beginning to reconsider how and when they value their assets. Although we have seen more early economic evaluations being performed at proof-of-concept or pre-regulatory approval stages, we still don’t see enough rTPP strategy to support value-building and long-term positioning.
Biotechs will put off rTPP because it may require primary reimbursement research and/or initial evidence generation in phase 2, which costs them more in the short-term. During the evidence generation phase, studies may include a comparator arm that will serve to prove the drug’s safety and effectiveness compared to the standard of care. Together with the rTPP, this evidence helps biotechs understand how economically viable their asset is compared to the market. An rTPP also helps you to establish clear kill points – if your drug doesn’t demonstrate utility, meet a previously unmet need or have a strong projected ROI, then it becomes clear that there is not much point in continuing development. This clarity can prevent you from burning through your funding.
Why should they? – In short, it builds value.
When we consult with biotech companies, one of our first questions is, “Do you have an rTPP?”. It’s that important. Ultimately, the end-goal isn’t approval, it’s the position with the payers and access to patients. When telling the story of your drug, you need to point to exactly who your patients are, how your asset meets their needs and how it provides value for the price within a standard of care. This shift in focus requires you to demonstrate the utility of your drug.
Due diligence and investor confidence
We regularly perform due diligence for clients, be it potential acquirers of an asset or institutions looking to invest. In either case, they will perform due diligence on an asset. What investors look for, particularly in late stage is not just approval but pricing and reimbursement. The real question for them is, once we get to approval, will it be reimbursed, and will it be valuable?
When we conduct due diligence for clients, we inspect the gaps in the package and how that will be perceived either by an investor or by a payer, which ultimately reflects the success in the market. By developing an rTPP, you can develop a clearer picture of the return on investment overtime. It's important for investors to see that you've considered the end game. Whether you incorporated it into your early strategy or not, it's more important to demonstrate that you are thinking long term.
Detailed and dynamic data-responsive strategy
Data, along with literature and landscape reviews, can help you identify unmet medical needs to target when you develop an asset, which drives the value of the product. However, a comprehensive rTPP should be data-responsive instead of a fixed target. New data, including changes in regulation or standard of care, should constantly be leveraged to enrich or refocus your rTPP. Claims data and real-world data provide insights into comorbidity and invaluable information on the way drugs are prescribed, providing richer patient profiles that will shape your strategy.
As you revise your rTPP with new outside data, it should also be responsive to your own data. The TPP will outline base case, target and upside scenarios, but data we get may either add or detract from those positions and you will need to respond accordingly. Changes in the standard of care due to new market entries, emerging safety data from certain classes of drugs or changes in regulatory positions may all potentially impact your rTPP and overall development strategy. Using the rTPP as a reference can help to navigate these changes can keep you from chasing results that won’t bring value in the long run.
Conclusion
At ICON, we work with biotech companies and large pharmaceutical companies and have a strong network of investment banks and venture capital firms that affords us a unique perspective on what builds value into your asset development process. Developing a reimbursable Target Product Profile is a clear way to demonstrate the economic viability and potential return on investment by exploring the real-world use, patient and market positioning. We recommend building an rTPP into your development strategy as early as possible and we provide tailored teams from our 8,000 biotech specialists to assist you in this process.
For more information on how ICON can assist in developing a reimbursable Target Product Profile or building value into your biotech asset, contact us.
Authored by: Colin Orford
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- Remote Patient Monitoring
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Patient Centricity
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Diversity and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
- Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
-
Therapeutics insights
- Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
- Central Nervous System
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
- Blended solutions insights
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Global Outcomes Benchmarking
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel