At its core, a patient registry is a collection of information about individuals.
They are typically created by research or academic institutions, or by individual research teams for the purpose of collecting observational data, which can then be used for a specific research agenda. These registries may be operated by a single institution or by a collaborative of multiple institutions or clinics.
Patient registries exist for a wide range of conditions, including neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s and other dementias. What’s more, they can be used for a number of purposes, including recruiting patients for clinical trials related to their illness; studying a particular population’s behavioral patterns and their association with disease development; or monitoring and improving the quality of healthcare.1
In current patient registries, most of the participants have already progressed to a later stage in their disease. However, individuals in the prodromal stages of a neurodegenerative disorder, such as Alzheimer’s, who would actually benefit from early intervention, may not be aware of the benefits of participating in a registry.
As it stands now, the number of registries for research that specifically looks at early intervention are minimal. Out of 31 ongoing registries in 2017 for Alzheimer’s, for example, only five were identified as recruiting individuals who are in the prodromal or early stages of the disease.2
So, how do you build more robust registries for neurodegenerative diseases and motivate people to register and update their registry information if they are either asymptomatic or in the early stages of the disease? The answer could be through the development of patient-powered registries in conjunction with a series of awareness campaigns to inform the public of early onset symptoms, high-risk environmental factors and family-linked genetic risk.
What are patient-powered registries?
Unlike traditional patient registries which are managed by academic institutions, in patient-powered registries, patients and family members – not researchers – manage or control the overall direction of the study, including (1) the collection of data, (2) the research agenda for the data, and (3) how the data will be shared and reported.
In essence, these registries are built from the bottom-up, enabling a peer-to-peer interaction and the open sharing of information. As a consequence, patients and their families are more likely to be motivated to participate in these types of registries, rather than the more traditional ones, precisely because they are patient centered. Additionally, these registries have been shown to do a better job at boosting clinical trial enrolment and the overall availability of data than traditional patient registries.3
Combining awareness with patient-powered registries
However, developing a patient-powered registry for a specific neurodegenerative disorder, alone, won’t be enough to attract asymptomatic patients who have a family history of the disease. To truly elicit the highest participation, patient-powered registries need to be used in conjunction with a continuous flow of awareness campaign strategies designed around the urgency of early detection.
In this regard, the peer-to-peer communication that is organically promoted through patient-powered registries – via such forms as email and social media – are the perfect medium to combine these awareness strategies. Here, participants can exchange messages and experiences, so that the importance of early detection in asymptomatic patients, genetic risks and environmental factors are maximised and eventually filtered down to specific targets of the message – namely prospective patients who are either asymptomatic or who exhibit early symptoms of the disease. To that end, there are three awareness campaigns that should be promoted:
- Communications around early onset symptoms and the importance of early diagnostic evaluations. This will help prospective patients realise that even though they are not experiencing symptoms, they are still potentially facing risk from environmental and genetic factors. Additional emphasis should be placed on the importance of early evaluation and diagnosis as powerful factors in treating neurodegenerative disorders.
- Communications discussing genetic and inherited risks, so that prospective participants understand that being asymptomatic does not ensure they will have no future risk of neurodegenerative diseases, and that early registry participation can help inform and open up new strategies of treatment, should that person have a genetic neurodegenerative disorder.
- Discussions around environmental risks for the purpose of encouraging registry participation in asymptomatic neurodegenerative disease sample populations.
Conclusion
Patient-powered registries, as opposed to traditional patient registries, offer a more robust recruitment strategy that will increase the participation of either asymptomatic neurodegenerative patients or those in the early stages of the disorder. However, to truly maximise this participation, the communication pathways of patient-powered registries need to be explored to strategically raise awareness of the benefits of early detection of neurodegenerative diseases and to highlight the fact that neurodegeneration usually occurs before detectable symptoms manifest.
CNS, pain and ageing related disorders insights
ICON's experienced neuroscience and drug development teams regularly share their insights in industry publications and through ICON produced content in the form of blogs and whitepapers. Read more content from our experts.
References
- Rubinstein Y. Patient Registries. [Accessed March 1, 2013]. http://rarediseases.info.nih.gov/PatientRegistry.aspx
- Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. Annual data report technical summary. Bethesda, 2018
- Pierson, Sheila K, et al., ACCELERATE: A Patient-Powered Natural History Study Design Enabling Clinical and Therapeutic Discoveries in a Rare Disorder, Cell Reports Medicine, 2020
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- Remote Patient Monitoring
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Patient Centricity
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Diversity and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
- Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
-
Therapeutics insights
- Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
- Central Nervous System
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
- Blended solutions insights
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Global Outcomes Benchmarking
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel