An end-to-end solution is required to run a successful digital trial
The pharmaceutical industry spent approximately four times more on R&D in 2015 than in 1995, with no corresponding increase in the number of drugs approved by the FDA (1). These spiraling costs can be attributed to a transition away from the traditional “one size fits all” model, which has led to difficulty defining clinical endpoints and an inability to recruit or retain patients.
As a result, digital disruption in the form of new wearables, sensors and medical devices are emerging to enable pharmaceutical and medical device companies to generate new types of datasets. Moreover, artificial intelligence and machine learning can generate new insights and responsive digital biomarkers from these new datasets. All of these factors are coming together to enable a growing revolution that can combat declining R&D efficiency: the implementation of digital trials.
Digital trials, which are defined as the use of mHealth and mobile technology to capture insights outside of a traditional clinical setting, present solutions to the challenges being faced by the pharma industry, making them increasingly appealing to patients, healthcare providers and payers. The global movement towards digital clinical trials has been occurring over the past several years and it offers drug companies the opportunity to leverage the technical advances in this huge and growing mhealth market, estimated to be worth $163 billion by 2020 (1).
Benefits of digital trials
In a recent survey carried out by the Centre for Information and Study on Clinical Research Participation, 24 percent of participants cited “too many study visits” as the reason for deciding not to take part in a clinical trial, while “travel burden” was cited by 79 percent of those surveyed on the barriers for clinical research participation (1).
As a result, there has been increased awareness of the value of a mHealth in clinical trials to improve patient recruitment and retention. For example, hospital networks such as the UCLA Health , are using mHealth to monitor patients remotely, allowing patients and caregivers to manage their health from the comfort of their own homes, reducing the number of clinical visits (2)., It is estimated that more than 7.1 million patients are utilising remote monitoring and connected medical devices as a way to better educate themselves about their disease (3).
Despite their clear benefits to patients, in addition to their ability to generate new datasets, the use of mHealth and other digital technologies in clinical trials has been limited to a relatively small number of pilots due to a lack of framework for the planning and execution of these trials.
Navigating the complexities of digital trials
To successfully operationalise digital trials, careful consideration during clinical trial design should be focused on three main areas: patients, devices and data.
Patient considerations
One of the leading challenges when implementing these devices is the patient’s inability or inconvenience in using the digital technology. To ensure success of digital trials, it is critical that devices and sensors can collect data that is clinically meaningful with minimal impact on patients as they go about their daily lives.
Apps and devices should be designed with the user experience in mind, and should add value to the patient experience, while part of the study. A “bring your own device” (BYOD) model is ideal, so that patients do not have to deal with multiple mobile devices.
Device considerations
To seamlessly incorporate digital technologies into clinical trials, device selection should be made with study objectives, trial design and patient population in mind from the start.
Both medical devices and other grade technologies can play a role in digital studies, as long as there is sufficient evidence to support the use in that specific patient population, since a device that works well in one population may not transfer well to another.
From a regulatory perspective, the device needs to be able to capture and transfer the required data in accordance with local privacy and security regulations. These aspects will be key when presenting the CSR to regulators.
Data considerations
When selecting a digital platform, the ability to analyse high-frequency data is important. Additionally, to generate meaningful insights, data scientists who are skilled experts in advanced analytics are needed to generate meaningful endpoints from the high volume of data coming from devices and sensors.
A recent Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative recommended that it may be prudent to carry out a short feasibility study prior to implementation of the technology, especially in larger studies, to allow for the de-risking of large trials (2).
Seek guidance to ensure success
To run a successful digital trial, a complete end-to-end solution is required. Carefully selected technology, combined with the right trial design and operational excellence, will increase the likelihood of success. ICON is an experienced partner who partner with Intel on their Intel® Pharma Analytics Platform, an edge-to-cloud AI digital platform. Together they can help you navigate these nuances to ensure the success of your digital trial.
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- Remote Patient Monitoring
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Patient Centricity
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Diversity and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
- Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
-
Therapeutics insights
- Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
- Central Nervous System
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
- Blended solutions insights
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Global Outcomes Benchmarking
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel