Dr. Arinder Sihota, PhD
In October, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) released their much anticipated Go-Live plan following input from all of the National Competent Authorities in the European Economic Area (EEA). The Go-Live plan includes a 10 day EudraVigilance downtime from 8 November to 21 November 2017 to allow for the migration of 11 million Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) from the current database.
The EMA has stressed that it is vitally important that the transition is not in haste with the sheer volume of data involved. The public health benefits with the new system and the operational benefits for stakeholders and regulators will provide a robust basis for pharmacovigilance and signal management activities for years to come.
The new EudraVigilance will allow for submissions to be carried out in ICH E2B(R3) format. Any submissions being carried out via the WebTrader or EVWeb function in EudraVigilance will need to be in ICH E2B(R3) format, this is applicable for sponsors and Marketing Authorisation Holders (MAHs). MAHs also need to be prepared for cases downloaded from EudraVigilance which will also be in ICH E2B(R3) format.
In case an MAH does not hold an ICH E2B(R3) compliant database they should ensure that they have a tested and validated Backwards and Forwards Conversion tool (BFC) available for use. As a further contingency and depending on the case volumes expected, the EudraVigilance Workspace can also be used to download human readable forms of the ICH E2B (R3) xmls to perform manual data entry into your safety database. Gateway submissions can continue in ICH E2B (R2) format if you are yet to upgrade your safety database.
In addition to the above, 22 November 2017 is the start date for when MAHs will have greater access to ICSRs for signal detection activities, simplified reporting and a requirement for submitting all EEA non-serious cases to EudraVigilance.
Webinar: Ensuring pharmacovigilance compliance and robust oversight at the affiliate level
Explore the benefits of adopting an outsourced model for pharmacovigilance.
The EMA Go-Live plan
The plan is complex and each National Competent Authority (NCA) has stipulated their own specific requirements. Iceland have released additional information on their webpage with some updated requirements compared to those provided in the plan. In addition, Germany have requested for manual data entry of cases to their local portal. Some NCAs have requested for line-listings during the downtime. BfArM and MHRA have stipulated that EudraVigilance gateway submissions will still be possible. Finally, EVWeb submissions, XEVMPD entries and registrations will not be possible; however, the XCOMP environment will be available.
MAHs and sponsors will then have from 22 November 2017 until 24 November 2017 to submit all cases received during the downtime into EudraVigilance. In order to ensure compliance it is highly recommended to prepare cases in the XCOMP environment for EVWeb during the downtime to reduce the workload from the Go-live. This of course necessitates that all data required to create an ICH E2B(R3) case are available from the start of the downtime, such as deficiency lists to enable the accurate population of nullflavors.
Signal detection in the EudraVigilance Data Analysis System (EVDAS) and ICSR download functionality by MAHs
Access to EVDAS and ICSR download function is at EudraVigilance Headquarter level. The level of visibility of the ICSRs will also depend on how the product is entered in XEVMPD. It is advisable to merge separate EudraVigilance Headquarter profiles for MAHs where affiliates have been registered separately. From 22 November it will be possible for QPPVs to register users for L2B access to allow for narrative requests if not already done so and we will finally be able to access the EVDAS environment.
Transitional arrangements for MAHs
In July, the EMA announced that they would offer a grace period to streamline the monitoring of EudraVigilance while MAHs were familiarising themselves with the new systems and finalising their own processes. During a pilot period of one year, only MAHs whose active substances have been included in the list of medicines under additional monitoring on 22 November 2017 would be mandated to monitor EudraVigilance and inform the EMA and national competent authorities of validated signals with their medicines. The requirement for medicines under additional monitoring will start on 22 February 2018.
Getting ready
Taking into account the new regulations, the downtime and the go-live date the following actions are advised for readiness:
- Arrange for your representatives to attend relevant EMA stakeholder meetings and trainings
- Develop implementation and roll-out plans to include procedural updates, training, extra resourcing and system validations
- Contact NCAs for their specific requirements to ensure compliance with all of the upcoming changes
- Devise a change management plan to allow you to adapt quickly to the new and updated information as it becomes available from EMA
Our pharmacovigilance and drug safety team has been working with a multitude of MAHs and sponsors that have various portfolios and requirements to ensure readiness. If you require assistance in understanding the new regulations and how they impact your business, we are available to support you to assure compliance.
For more information ICONplc.com/pharmacovigilance
Dr. Arinder Sihota, PhD
Drug Safety Manager
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- Remote Patient Monitoring
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Patient Centricity
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Diversity and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
- Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
-
Therapeutics insights
- Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
- Central Nervous System
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
- Blended solutions insights
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Global Outcomes Benchmarking
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel