Digitalisation's ootential to shorten timelines and reduce Costs
It’s been nearly two decades since Electronic Data Capture (EDC) technology was introduced into clinical trials – one of the first significant steps in automating the trial process. Now, with the availability of robotic process automation (RPA), cognitive analytics, and artificial intelligence (AI), it’s time to press on with further digitalisation of clinical development. Gartner defines digitalisation as “the use of digital technologies to change a business model and provide new revenue and value-producing opportunities.[1]
Even though clinical development is, by its very nature, a “people business,” there is ample opportunity to use these new technologies to perform manual tasks, reducing the opportunity for error, freeing staff for higher-value tasks and speeding processes. Ultimately, automation can help us dramatically shorten development timelines and realise significant cost savings.
Many sponsor companies and contract research organisations (CROs) are already working to automate steps in Phase II and Phase III research programs, but less emphasis has been placed on ways to automate aspects of late phase research. These studies are also ripe for digitalisation, although not always in the same ways.
Prime targets for automation
From our vantage point, there are three areas within late phase research that have the greatest untapped potential to benefit from digitalisation: site activation activities, study management responsibilities, and patient engagement efforts.
Late Phase Fit-for-purpose Site Activation
Many of the requisite steps in preparing to activate sites are currently one of the biggest bottlenecks in studies. These include but not limited to negotiating site contracts and assembling all of the necessary documents, ensuring that they are complete and submitted for approval. When examined closely, these activities follow a very defined – albeit complicated – path that can be easily managed in an automated workflow within a digital platform. Although site activation in late phase research is naturally faster than that of early phase research, automation provides a framework to cut down on cycle times even further.
Late Phase Study Management
Automation, of course, supports all aspects of site engagement and management, particularly remote and risk-based monitoring, a practice that is particularly well suited to late phase studies. But, there’s also the potential to use automation to further enhance and streamline site engagement at the individual site level such as through tailored call campaigns, query management, and remote and on-site close-out activities. Another area worthy of innovation via technology is reducing the burden of on-site staff so that they can dedicate more time to patient care. This is especially important in late phase research that involves a larger percentage of community physicians whose focus is on providing the standard of care to their patients.
Late Phase Patient Engagement
Much progress has already been made in this area, with digital solutions for recruiting, consenting, educating, retaining, and supporting patients in clinical research. With Google’s recent preview of a digital assistant for mobile devices with a human-like voice capable of conversing back and forth to accomplish specific tasks, such as making an appointment, the app’s capabilities will be expanded, and it boggles the mind to imagine what might be possible. For instance, and as applicable, engaging a digital assistant with patients to remind them of their upcoming appointment, manage their travel schedules or even provide them with standard medical information details about approved drugs or devices.
The value of a centralised approach
At ICON, we’re finding that we can adopt a much more comprehensive and strategic approach to automation (and provide a seamless experience for sites and patients in late phase studies) by tackling it from a centralised function. We’ve created a real world evidence hub infrastructure with service hubs in every region of the world. Each provides end-to end site and direct-to-patient services (separated by a firewall), so that sites and patients alike have but one point of contact with us for the duration of the study. This is important when dealing with healthcare providers who are not accustomed to the rigors of trial participation. Similarly, patient engagement services are integrated, with the goal of simplifying the patient’s journey while being part of clinical research. This hub structure allows us to develop digital solutions to improve the entire study process, end to end, using lean and innovative design.
We believe that twenty years into automating clinical trial processes, the industry is on the cusp of another transformation that promises to have a profound effect on study timelines and costs. The benefit of the next wave of automation, made possible through RPA, cognitive analytics, and AI, will, of course, be magnified when these innovations are adopted across studies and research programs.
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- Remote Patient Monitoring
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Patient Centricity
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Diversity and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
- Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
-
Therapeutics insights
- Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
- Central Nervous System
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
- Blended solutions insights
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Global Outcomes Benchmarking
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel