Gathering data for these studies usually requires enlisting far more study sites than for earlier phases of research – typically hundreds around the world, many of which are without research experience. Yet, overseeing so many sites that require significant support using traditional site management models is excessively complex, not to mention expensive. Travel costs, alone, can be prohibitive.
ICON is introducing an innovative, technology-enabled, end-to-end site and patient engagement model. Designed specifically for managing late-phase studies in multiple languages and cultures, it applies lean design, and global communication tools to provide continuous site support throughout the world. It has been shown to improve data collection, data quality, and site and patient engagement. Moreover, it can significantly reduce late-phase study costs.
Single Point of Contact
The ICON model is built around a centralised site management associate (SMA) who operates remotely and serves as a single point of contact from the day a site is identified until the day the site is closed out. Located in regional hubs around the world and fluent in local languages and customs, SMAs provide the clear direction, continuous support and convenient access to study materials that sites need to succeed.
Where clinical research associates (CRAs) in traditional models are primary site contacts while constantly traveling, SMAs are available by phone or online whenever a site needs assistance. Constant one-on-one contact builds rapport and keeps sites engaged, which in turn helps to recruit and engage patients More importantly, this model provides for a more efficient use of an SMA’s time and skills, which saves money even as it improves quality.
Relieved of the burden of travel requirements, SMA turnover is far lower than in traditional on-site support models. This ensures that sites will be continuously and consistently supported over time by the same staff members, which, in turn, keeps sites engaged.
SMAs can remotely qualify, activate and manage sites and assist site staff with training and data collection, throughout the study.
Moreover, remote risk-based data monitoring makes it possible for SMAs to continuously review outliers and identify risks so that they can manage risks, centrally. This improves data quality and prevents later data exclusion, hence reducing the need for over-enrolling studies as a data cushion.
The same technology-enabled infrastructure also supports patients. Data collection from home reduces unnecessary clinic visits, and data-driven reminders and information hotlines encourage patients to stay on treatment plans. This patient-centric approach improves outcomes, keeps patients engaged and promotes further bonding with sites, which also helps ensure optimal study outcomes.
Flexible Model
A centralised site manager model does not do away with on-site CRAs. Rather, it enables CRAs to be used more effectively and efficiently. Specifically, CRAs will work in tandem with the SMAs and are dispatched when onsite visits are imminent with handovers prior and after the onsite visit is completed.
The centralised SMA model is flexible in how much it uses SMAs and CRAs. The ratio of services is adjusted based on individual study types (such as a registry or complex interventional trial), protocol needs and regulatory requirements.
Combined with ICON’s unparalleled global footprint, providing services in more than 30 languages in Europe, Asia Pacific, the Middle East and the Americas, this flexible site and patient engagement model gives sponsors the end-to-end support needed to successfully conduct late-stage studies anywhere in the world – often at substantially lower costs over traditional support models. As a result, more and better late-stage studies are economically feasible.
Along with ICON’s asset valuation, evidence generation and market access services, late-stage studies are an integral part of a comprehensive strategy for maximising sponsors’ portfolio value in increasingly global drug and medical device markets.
For a confidential evaluation of how ICON’s end-to-end, late-phase study services can help improve your bottom line, contact us at commercialisation@iconplc.com.
Related Information
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- Remote Patient Monitoring
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Patient Centricity
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Diversity and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
- Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
-
Therapeutics insights
- Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
- Central Nervous System
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
- Blended solutions insights
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Global Outcomes Benchmarking
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel